FW: NCTimes: Largest group yet sues over Witch Creek/Guejito fires

------ Forwarded Message
From: <char.ayers@att.net>
Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2008 00:29:12 +0000
To: Charlene Ayers <char.ayers@att.net>
Subject: NCTimes: Largest group yet sues over Witch Creek/Guejito fires

-------------- Forwarded Message: --------------
From: xxxxxxx
To: char.ayers@att.net
Subject: NCT: Largest group yet sues over Witch Creek/Guejito fires
Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2008 21:36:00 +0000




Last modified Saturday, April 12, 2008 1:29 AM PDT
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2008/04/12/news/sandiego/9f2ca1d355125eb3882
57428005993d1.txt


NCT REGION: Largest group yet sues over Witch Creek/Guejito fires

By CHRIS BAGLEY - Staff Writer

Photo: Chicken rancher Joe Cebe walks past the site where coops and 15,000
of his chickens were destroyed in the Witch Creek fire in October. Cebe and
more than 120 other families who were fire victims are suing San Diego Gas
& Electric Co., alleging that the utility was negligent in allowing power
cables to ignite the Witch Creek, Guejito and Rice fires. / DON BOOMER
S taff Photographer

SAN DIEGO ---- A group of 126 families filed a lawsuit against San Diego
Gas & Electric Co. on Friday afternoon, alleging that the utility was
negligent and "despicable" in allowing its power lines to spark three fires
that destroyed nearly $400 million in property and scorched a 200,000-acre
swath from Santa Ysabel to Rancho Santa Fe in October.

The lawsuit, filed in San Diego Superior Court, seeks a yet-unspecified
amount in restitution, along with punitive damages to deter future
negligence. Attorneys planning to litigate the case said they were still in
the process of estimating the scope of their clients' losses, but a
consulting attorney for the plaintiffs estimated that the totals could
reach $50 million.

The lawsuit alleges that the utility and its San Diego-based corporate
parent, Sempra Energy, didn't take the precautions necessary to keep
aboveground electrical cables from sparking against one another in the hot,
gale-force Santa Ana winds that swept out of the Southern California desert
on Oct. 21-22.

When one wire sways close enough to another that is strung parallel, a
charged electrical field can ignite tree branches or twigs blowing through
the air, said Murrieta attorney Mitch Wagner, one of four litigators whose
names appear on the complaint. Wires generally sway or blow in the same
direction but can easily come close enough to "arc" ---- spark ---- when
one snaps back toward the other, Wagner said.

The California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection reported in
November that sparks from electrical wires had caused all three fires. The
agency has declined to release details of its investigations until it
publishes a series of final reports, now expected next month.

Utility representatives have acknowledged the preliminary findings, but
have said repeatedly that no level of cautio n could ever prevent hot, dry
winds from blowing vegetation and electrical wires into one another. A
spokeswoman for SDG&E said she couldn't comment on the particulars of the
lawsuit, which hasn't been formally delivered to the company.

"There's a big distinction between what the ignition source is and whether
there's any liability," spokeswoman Stephanie Donovan said. "You really
can't protect your system 100 percent."

Wagner dismissed that argument, saying the company could have taken several
precautions short of burying the cables underground. The lawsuit alleges
that the company was fully aware of the potential for fire and that it
simply decided not to do anything about it.

An inflexible spacer installed between each set of poles, at the point
where the parallel wires sag closest to the ground, would have kept them at
a constant and safe distance from one another, the suit alleges. Rubber
sleeves would hav e served the same purpose, Wagner said.

"It doesn't take a weatherman to tell you that sagging lines are going to
blow together," Wagner said. "For them to say they're not aware would be
like a surgeon saying he doesn't know where the heart is."

Wagner said he and San Diego attorneys Tom Tosdal, Terry Singleton and
Gerald Singleton had delayed the filing of their lawsuit several times as
the report's release was pushed back from early February and then from
early April. A spokesman for CalFire said Friday the agency would begin May
1 to release a series of reports on Witch Creek/Guejito fires and the 20
other wind-driven fires that it battled in late October.

Donovan said company officials had become aware of the group and its intent
to sue. Sempra's annual financial report to the federal Securities and
Exchanged Commission mentioned the first five lawsuits but said the company
held $1 billion in liability insurance.
Wagner and the other attorneys gathered the plaintiffs through a series of
meetings in Ramona and other areas damaged by the fires.

The plaintiffs are concentrated along the Highway 78 corridor between
Escondido and Santa Ysabel, site of the 198,000-acre Witch Creek/Guejito
fire complex. A San Diego County government report released in November
estimated the two fires, which started on Oct. 21 and 22 and soon merged,
destroyed 1,075 houses and caused $295 million in damage.

About a half-dozen of the plaintiffs in the newest lawsuit live in
Fallbrook and Rainbow, where the 9,500-acre Rice fire broke out Oct. 22,
consulting attorney Michael Feinberg said. The county report estimated
damage from that fire at $100 million, including 240 houses and 1,000 acres
of agricultural land.

The suit filed Friday follows five suits filed since mid-November. A San
Diego attorney representing two of the plaintiff groups said Fri day that
his clients and two other sets of plaintiffs were seeking to have their
cases consolidated into a single case. The attorney, James Frantz, said the
group would then seek class status, which would allow them to press their
claim on behalf of a large number of others.

Even so, the 126 families whose names appear on the complaint Friday make
up by far the largest group of named plaintiffs to file suit over the
fires. Wagner said his clients' losses varied widely, from chickens and
flower fields to cars, houses, and personal mementos. For that reason, he
and the other attorneys said they're seeking to have their clients' case
considered separately from any class that's certified.

"We're talking about the destruction of people's homes," Wagner said.
"We're talking about ... emotional distress. It requires individualized
presentation to a jury."

------ End of Forwarded Message